LAW.coLAW.co

JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2018-8

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel of Oklahoma2018-10-19No. No. 2018-8
434 P.3d 15

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The organization is a charitable and educational organization related in purpose and mission to the Judges role as the Presiding Judge of the Cleveland County Adult Drug Court. The organization does not participate politically or appear in court and is not an activity that reflects adversely upon the Judges independence, integrity, or impartiality. In this context, participation in an extrajudicial activity must also comply with Rule 3.1. This rule prohibits conduct by participation in activities that interfere with the judicial duties; frequently causes disqualification; places into question the judges independence, integrity or impartiality; could be considered coercive or, improperly makes use of court premises, staff or court resources. We find nothing in this Judges relationship with this organization that violates either Rule 3.1 or Rule 3.7 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

/s/ The Honorable April Sellers White, (Retired)

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel Member

/s/ The Honorable Edward C. Cunningham, (Retired)

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel Chair

/s/ The Honorable William C. Hetherington, (Retired)

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel Member

/s/ The Honorable Allen McCall, (Retired)

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel Member

/s/ The Honorable Thomas Landrith, (Retired)

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel Member