LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE ESTATE OF Jacqueline GLADSTONE. In re Estate of Jacqueline Gladstone.

Court of Appeals of Georgia2018-09-06No. A16A1682; A16A1683
819 S.E.2d 71347 Ga. App. 244

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Reese, Judge.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Forsyth County Probate Court found that Emanuel Gladstone (Gladstone) breached his fiduciary duty as conservator for his incapacitated wife, Jacqueline Gladstone. The court entered a judgment against Gladstone and his surety, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Ohio Casualty), for $167,000 on the settlement of accounts and as damages and $150,000 in punitive damages. Both Gladstone and Ohio Casualty appealed (Case Numbers A16A1682 and A16A1683, respectively), and we affirmed the judgment.

The Supreme Court of Georgia granted the petition for certiorari filed by Ohio Casualty to determine:

(1) Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that a conservators bond covers punitive damages even though such damages are not expressly provided for under OCGA § 29-5-40 et seq. or under the provisions of the bond itself?

(2) If a conservators bond does cover punitive damages, did the Court of Appeals err in holding that because the probate court complied with OCGA § 29-5-92 (b) (4) in imposing sanctions against the petitioner, compliance with the procedures for imposing punitive damages under OCGA § 51-12-5.1 was not required?

The Supreme Court reversed our decision, holding that a conservators bond pursuant to OCGA § 29-5-40 et seq. does not cover punitive damages. The Supreme Court thus answer[ed] the first question in the affirmative, rendering the second question moot.

The Supreme Courts opinion addresses Divisions 6 and 7 of Gladstone I . The Supreme Court neither addressed nor considered the portions of our opinion addressing Gladstones appeal, Divisions 1 through 5. Divisions 1 through 5 thus remain binding on the parties, and we do not address them further.

Thus, we reverse the probate courts judgment to the extent it awarded punitive damages against Ohio Casualty and remand with direction that the trial court enter judgment against Ohio Casualty only for that portion of the award which did not constitute punitive damages, i.e., $167,000. We affirm in all other respects.

Judgment affirmed in Case No. A16A1682. Judgment in Case No. A16A1683 affirmed in part and reversed in part, and case remanded with direction.

Dillard, C. J., and Bethel, J., concur.

In re Estate of Jacqueline Gladstone , 341 Ga. App. 72, 798 S.E.2d 660 (2017) (Gladstone I ).

In re Estate of Jacqueline Gladstone , 303 Ga. 547, 814 S.E.2d 1 (2018) (Gladstone II ).

Id. at 550, 814 S.E.2d 1.

Id. at 547, 814 S.E.2d 1.

See Gladstone II , 303 Ga. at 548, n. 2, 814 S.E.2d 1 ; Gladstone I , 341 Ga. App. at 78-80 (6), 80 (7), 798 S.E.2d 660.

See Shadix v. Carroll County , 274 Ga. 560, 562-564 (1), 554 S.E.2d 465 (2001).