STROUD, Judge.
The background of this case can be found in this Courts prior opinion of Young v. Bailey , 240 N.C. App. 595, 771 S.E.2d 628, (2015), affd , 368 N.C. 665, 781 S.E.2d 277 (2016). The prior appeal was filed in this same case and addressed the same claims and issues. See id. at 596, 771 S.E.2d at 629. Plaintiff Terri Young was a deputy sheriff in the Mecklenburg County Sheriffs Department. Id. Defendant Daniel Bailey was elected as sheriff, and defendant Bailey then terminated plaintiffs employment. See id. Plaintiff filed this lawsuit alleging she had been terminated for unlawful reasons. See id. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, and the trial court granted summary judgment for defendants, dismissing plaintiffs claims. Id. Plaintiff appealed, and this Court affirmed the trial courts judgment. Id. at 601, 771 S.E.2d at 632. Plaintiff then petitioned the North Carolina Supreme Court for discretionary review, and the Supreme Court affirmed this Courts opinion in January of 2016. See Young v. Bailey , 368 N.C. 665, 781 S.E.2d 277.
In November of 2017, plaintiff filed a motion with the trial court under Rule 60(b)(6) for relief from judgment, arguing she was entitled to resurrect her claim based upon the United State Supreme Courts opinion in Heffernan v. City of Patterson , N.J. , 136 S. Ct. 1412, 194 L. Ed 2d 508 (2016), which was decided after the North Carolina Supreme Court had affirmed the dismissal of her claim. Plaintiff alleged Heffernan controls this case. On 16 February 2018, the trial court entered an order denying plaintiffs motion. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff Youngs case is in the same procedural position, and her argument is the same as the plaintiffs argument in McLaughlin v. Bailey , --- N.C. App. ----, ---, S.E.2d ----, ---- (Feb. 5, 2019), which is filed simultaneously with this opinion. For the same reasons as stated in McLaughlin , we reject plaintiffs argument. Based upon McLaughlin , we affirm the trial courts 16 February 2018 order denying plaintiffs Rule 60 motion.
AFFIRMED.
Report per Rule 30(e).
Judges DIETZ and BERGER concur.