QUICKEN LOANS, INC., Appellant, v. Wayne D. WILSON ; Calvin O. Wilson, III; any other Heirs-in-Law or devisees of Ezekiel (Ellen) T. Wilson, deceased, their heirs, personal representatives, administrators, successors and assigns, and all other persons entitled to claim through them; all unknown persons with any right, title or interests in the real estate described herein; also any persons who may be in a class designated as John Doe; any unknown minors or persons under a disability being a class designated as Richard Roe; and Park Sterling Bank, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina2019-01-09No. Appellate Case No. 2016-001214; Opinion No. 5613

823 S.E.2d 697425 S.C. 574

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

II. REMAINING ISSUES

Based on our finding Quicken did not violate the attorney preference statute, we decline to address its remaining arguments.

See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613, 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (stating an appellate court need not address remaining issues when a decision on a prior issue is dispositive). CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the order on appeal is

REVERSED.

HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.