LAW.coLAW.co

Louise R. RYTERSKI-HALL, Respondent, v. C. Michael HALL, Appellant.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR2018-03-13No. No. ED 105439
544 S.W.3d 685

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM

C. Michael Hall appeals from the trial courts Judgment denying his Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).