PER CURIAM.
John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion courts denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).