LAW.coLAW.co

L.R.S., Respondent, v. C.A.S., Appellant.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One2018-05-22No. No. ED 106260
550 S.W.3d 571

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).