PER CURIAM
Daniel Wade (Husband) appeals the trial courts judgment dissolving his marriage to Tamara Wade (Wife). Husbands sole point on appeal is the trial court erred in dividing the parties marital property because no evidence was presented on the value of Husbands pension. Finding the trial courts judgment supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence, we affirm. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).