PER CURIAM.
Wilma Pennington-Thurman (Appellant), acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying her motion to reopen two actions for fraud and wrongful foreclosure, both of which were finally decided in 2010. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).