PER CURIAM.
James Nichols appeals the motion courts judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion courts findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).