PER CURIAM.
We have for review Henry Perry Sirecis appeal of the circuit courts order denying Sirecis motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
Sirecis motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Courts decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Sirecis appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Sireci responded to this Courts order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
After reviewing Sirecis response to the order to show cause, as well as the States arguments in reply, we conclude that Sireci is not entitled to relief. Sireci was sentenced to death following a jurys recommendation for death by a vote of eleven to one. Sireci v. State, 587 So.2d 450, 451-52 (Fla. 1991). Sirecis sentence of death became final in 1992. Sireci v. Florida, 503 U.S. 946, 112 S.Ct. 1500, 117 L.Ed.2d 639 (1992). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Sirecis sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Sirecis motion.
The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Sireci, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
I concur in result because I recognize that this Courts opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.