PER CURIAM.
Nicholas McBride seeks review of an order revoking his probation in two separate cases and the corresponding sentences.
We affirm in all respects. We note that the revocation order erroneously states that the sentence in count four in case 2013-CF-3593 is consecutive, as opposed to concurrent, to the sentence in count two in that case. However, this scriveners error has not been preserved for review, and it appears that McBride will not be prejudiced by this error as the actual written sentence is correct. Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.