Further, the 404(B) evidence which the state seeks to introduce is highly prejudicial. Even assuming, arguendo, that the states evidence meets the strict standards of La.Code Evid. art. 404(B), the evidence is unquestionably more prejudicial than probative, in contravention of La.Code Evid. art. 403, and should not be allowed. Therefore, I would grant this writ, reverse the trial courts ruling, and deny the states Prieur motion.
STATE of Louisiana v. Briceson CARTER
240 So. 3d 907
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.