PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015) (holding that if the return of service is regular on its face, service of process is presumed to be valid, and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence); Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same).