Per Curiam.
Tanya Cairns appeals a final order denying the Department of Revenues proposed order to modify an administrative child support order. She contends the administrative law judge incorrectly calculated the fathers child support obligation and effectively modified the parents time-sharing arrangement by finding that the father had visitation with the child eighty percent of the time. Cairns arguments appear to be based on a misreading of the child support guidelines worksheet. In calculating the child support obligation, the judge multiplied the fathers basic support obligation by eighty percent, which represents the percentage of the other parents overnight stays with the child. See § 61.30(11)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The judge did not find that the father had visitation eighty percent of the time. Nor did the order modify, in any way, the existing time-sharing plan. Because the judges findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm.
Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.