PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See M.F. v. State, 255 So.3d 519, 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (When reviewing the adequacy of a Richardson hearing, a ruling that no [discovery] violation occurred moots any inquiry into whether there was procedural prejudice.); see also Mascolo v. State, 774 So.2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ([T]he trial court found there was no discovery violation. We find that the record supports the decision of the trial court and therefore we find no error.).