MEMORANDUM **
Patsy N. Sakuma appeals pro se from the district courts post-judgment orders in her action alleging Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Sakumas Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion for relief from judgment, or by denying leave to file a motion for reconsideration, because Sakuma failed to demonstrate any basis for the requested relief. See id. (setting forth grounds for relief under Rule 59(e) or 60(b)); see also Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., 452 F.3d 1097, 1102-04 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining that Rule 60(b)(6) relief may be granted only where extraordinary circumstances are present).
We do not consider Sakumas contentions concerning her prior appeal (Case No. 16-16791).
Sakumas request for judicial notice, set forth in her opening brief, is denied as unnecessary.
AFFIRMED.