Ricky Butler seeks to appeal the district courts orders granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, denying Butlers motions for reconsideration, and granting in part and denying in part several pretrial motions in Butlers 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the claims raised in Butlers complaint. Id. at 696-97. Because Butlers claims against one Defendant are still proceeding before the district court, and the court did not certify its orders for immediate appeal, we conclude that the orders Butler seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Butlers motion to voluntarily withdraw certain claims as moot and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Id. at 699.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.