Daniel Trinidad Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judges (IJ) decision finding him removable as charged. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agencys factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), or that the Board erred in finding that Gonzalez failed to show that he was prejudiced because the IJ did not offer him the opportunity to apply for cancellation of removal or other forms of relief from removal. See In re Gonzalez, (B.I.A. Aug. 19, 2020). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
PER CURIAM:
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.