Alan Peter Darcy appeals the district courts orders denying his pro se “Emergency Motion” and his subsequent counseled motion to strike. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Darcy, No. 1:17-cr-00036-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 26 & 27, 2020); see also United States v. Janati, 374 F.3d 263, 273 (4th Cir. 2004) (recognizing district courts’ “wide-ranging control over management of their dockets”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.