[Unpublished]
Leng Lee appeals the sentence imposed by the district court
1
after he pleaded guilty to firearm offenses under a plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging the sentence and suggesting trial counsel was ineffective. The court granted Lee permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, but he did not file one. We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because Lee entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, his challenge to the sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant counsels motion to withdraw. FOOTNOTES
1
. The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.