MEMORANDUM ***
Defendant Ronald Gene Ross, Jr. was convicted of one count of receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). He was sentenced to 78 months in prison and a lifetime term of supervised release. In 2020, the district court revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 72 days in custody and lifetime supervised release. Ross challenges two conditions of supervised release related to polygraph exams that may be conducted as part of his treatment program. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.
The government contends that this case is not ripe for review. However, “[a] term of supervised release, even if contingent, is part and parcel of the defendants sentence and can be challenged on direct appeal.” United States v. Weber, 451 F.3d 552, 557 (9th Cir. 2006). Ross asserts a facial challenge to alleged inconsistencies in his conditions of supervised release so that challenge is ripe for review.
Ross argues that the conditions violate his Fifth Amendment rights because he may be discharged from the required treatment program based on a valid invocation of the Fifth Amendment during polygraph exams, and the discharge could lead to revocation of his supervision. “We review the district courts decision to impose conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.” United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 1002 (9th Cir. 2008). “[W]e review de novo claims that such conditions violate the Constitution.” United States v. Evans, 883 F.3d 1154, 1159–60 (9th Cir. 2018).
The conditions do not violate the Fifth Amendment. “[A] defendant retains his Fifth Amendment rights during” polygraph exams. Stoterau, 524 F.3d at 1003–04 (citation omitted). The absence of language ensuring compliance with the Fifth Amendment does not render the condition unconstitutional or otherwise infirm. The government admits that Rosss supervised release cannot be revoked based on a valid invocation of the Fifth Amendment during a polygraph exam.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.