Montello Marquette Hood appeals from the district courts order granting his motion for reconsideration of its prior order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) motion.
*
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hood, No. 0:10-cr-00707-JFA-1 (D.S.C. July 17, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Although the district court granted Hoods motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he requested.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.