MEMORANDUM ***
Saticoy Bay Series 1218 Coach (Saticoy Bay) appeals the district courts order granting summary judgment to Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon), finding that BNY Mellons predecessor preserved its deed of trust by tendering the superpriority amount prior to the Mews Homeowners Associations (HOA) foreclosure sale of a residential property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the summary judgment order de novo, Badgley v. United States, 957 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2020). We affirm.
BNY Mellon sufficiently established that before the foreclosure sale HOAs agent, Homeowners Association Services, Inc. (HAS), received and rejected the banks tender of $909.67, which covered nine months of unpaid HOA assessments and reasonable collection costs.
1
By operation of law, the tender extinguished HOAs superpriority lien, and Saticoy Bay purchased the property subject to BNY Mellons deed of trust. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 134 Nev. 604, 427 P.3d 113, 121 (Nev. 2018) (en banc), as amended on denial of rehg (Nov. 13, 2018) (“Diamond Spur”).
Saticoy Bays arguments are difficult to follow, but to the extent Saticoy Bay argues that Diamond Spur and Arlington West are distinguishable, those arguments fail. Saticoy Bays bona fide purchaser argument has been rejected by the Nevada Supreme Court. Diamond Spur, 427 P.3d at 121. And contrary to Saticoy Bays assertions, the tender letters paid-in-full condition did not prevent it from being an effective tender. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Arlington W. Twilight Homeowners Assn, 920 F.3d 620, 623 (9th Cir. 2019) (“Bank of America was entitled to insist on the condition ․ that acceptance would satisfy the HOAs superpriority lien.”).
Saticoy Bays remaining arguments are without merit.
2
AFFIRMED.
3
FOOTNOTES
1
. The tender was effectuated by counsel for BNY Mellons predecessor in the deed of trust.
2
. Saticoy Bay has been repeatedly admonished in other foreclosure cases for raising foreclosed arguments. See Alessi & Koenig, LLC v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 10250 Sun Dusk LN, 804 F. Appx 475, 477–78 (9th Cir. 2020) (“Saticoy has other appeals pending before this court advancing these same, explicitly rejected arguments. The court cautions Saticoy against pursuing non-meritorious appeals.”); Ditech Fin. LLC v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 829 Cornwall Glen, 794 F. Appx 667, 669 (9th Cir. 2020) (“In light of the published cases foreclosing Saticoys arguments, Saticoy and its counsel are warned not to raise such meritless arguments in the future.”). Here again, Saticoy Bay presents arguments that have already been rejected by this court and the Nevada Supreme Court—this time about the effect of a partys tendering of the superpriority amount of a homeowners association lien. Saticoy Bay and its counsel are once again warned not to assert clearly meritless or foreclosed arguments in future appeals.
3
. HOA, HAS, and Vegas Property Services, Inc. did not participate in this appeal.