DUNCAN v. K. Adams; Officer Adams; Officer Adonji; S. Caldwell; Officer John Doe 4; Officer Carter; Nurse John Doe 1; Officer John Doe 5; John Doe 2; John Doe 3; John Doe 6; Forsyth County; William T. Schatzman; Schutt; Officer Hommel; Wendy Hogan; A. Swallie; K. Turpin; Twonda White, Defendants. (2021)

Jonathan Torrey Duncan seeks to appeal the district courts order adopting the magistrate judges recommendation and dismissing 5 of the 18 named defendants in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Duncan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.