Gary Debenedetto appeals the district courts order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.
*
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Debenedetto v. Kallis, No. 5:19-hc-02267-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2020). We deny Debenedettos motion for summary disposition and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Although the district court dismissed Debenedettos petition without prejudice, we conclude that the district courts order is appealable. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 611 (4th Cir. 2020), petition for cert. filed, No. 20-759 (U.S. Dec. 2, 2020).
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.