MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiff/Appellant DW Aina Le‘a Development (DW) appeals the district courts dismissal of its takings claims under both the United States and Hawai‘i Constitutions as time-barred. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not recite them here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse in light of the Hawai‘i Supreme Courts recent answer to our certified question.
Following oral argument, we certified the question regarding the applicable statute of limitations for a takings claim brought under the Hawai‘i Constitution. The state court has now answered that question, holding that “the statute of limitations for a regulatory taking is six years, pursuant to the catch-all statute of limitations in Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 657-1(4).” DW Aina Le‘a Dev., LLC v. Haw. Land Use Commn, 148 Hawaii 396, 477 P.3d 836, 837 (2020). In light of the Hawai‘i Supreme Courts judgment, we vacate the district courts dismissal of DWs state takings claim.
We also vacate the district courts dismissal of DWs federal takings claim. There is no federal statute of limitations for federal takings claims brought against a state. When, as here, there is no “controlling federal limitations period, the general rule is that a state limitations period for an analogous cause of action is borrowed and applied to the federal claim, provided that the application of the state statute would not be inconsistent with underlying federal policies.” Cnty. of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 470 U.S. 226, 240, 105 S.Ct. 1245, 84 L.Ed.2d 169 (1985). In this case, the most analogous cause of action would be an inverse condemnation action under state law, which––as discussed—the Hawai‘i Supreme Court just informed us has a six-year statute of limitations. Applying the six-year statute of limitations, then, DWs state and federal takings claims are timely.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.