MEMORANDUM **
David Getzen appeals pro se from the district courts judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Erlin v. United States, 364 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Getzens action because it is barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. See Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 927 (9th Cir. 2004) (§ 1983 claims are governed by the forum states statute of limitations for personal injury claims); TwoRivers v. Lewis, 174 F.3d 987, 991-92 (9th Cir. 1999) (the statute of limitations for § 1983 claims in Arizona is two years).
Getzens motion for default (Docket Entry No. 15) and motion to consolidate (Docket Entry No. 16) are denied.
AFFIRMED.