LESTER CLAYTON, RESPONDENT, v. MARY STOKES CLAYTON, EXRS., ETC., APPELLANT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Bodine, Hei-ier, Porter, Colie, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 9.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Case, Donges, Wells, JJ. 4.