Appellant challenges a final order revoking community control and sentencing him to twenty years of imprisonment. Appointed counsel is unable to argue reversible error occurred below. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The arguments raised by Appellant in his pro se brief are without merit. We affirm the revocation and sentence, but upon suggestion of appointed counsel and confirmed by our independent review of the record, remand is required for entry of a corrected revocation order. The order entered states that Appellant violated three conditions of his community control. However, in its oral findings, the trial court found only one violation: failure to complete sex offender treatment (condition 18). Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to correct the scriveners error.
Affirmed and Remanded for entry of a corrected order.
Per Curiam.
Roberts, Ray, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.