Appellants Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.
As expressed in my concur in part, dissent in part opinion in Doty v. State, 313 So.3d 573 (Fla. Feb. 13, 2020), I maintain my dissent to the use of “determinations” instead of “findings” to describe the requirements set forth in section 921.141(2)(b)2., Florida Statutes (2018). However, because I concurred in the majoritys affirmance of Dotys death sentence, I also agree with the majoritys decision to deny rehearing. CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.
COURIEL and GROSSHANS, JJ., did not participate.