LAW.coLAW.co

ANTOINETTE COVIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1942-01-09
127 N.J.L. 596

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

Reargument of the issue joined in this cause was had pursuant to leave duly granted. It leaves us convinced that the judgment should be reversed, for the reasons set down in the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 126 N. J. L. 536. Appellant may proceed accordingly. For affirmance — Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Bodine, Heher, Colie, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.