ORDER
Nicholas Reed appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for child molestation in the first degree, enticement of a child, and two counts of sodomy in the first degree. Reed contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the testimony of a witness regarding uncharged misconduct and plainly erred in refusing his proffered limiting instruction on propensity evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Per Curiam: