Clarence Edward Cyrus appeals the district courts order denying his motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cyrus, No. 4:99-cr-00221-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.