[¶1] Joshua Visser appeals from a district court order denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility for the child he has with Alexandra Visser. Joshua Visser argues the district court erred in denying his motion because there was evidence of several material changes in circumstance and the courts findings under the best interest factors are clearly erroneous. We conclude the district courts decision is not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Per Curiam.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte