Hill, J.
1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error in the Supreme Court is without merit. Powell v. State, 152 Ga. 81 (108 S. E. 464) ; Moore v. Adams, 153 Ga. 709, 712 (113 S. E. 383, 23 A. L. R. 925).
2. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers, nor in granting the temporary injunction. While there are separate exceptions to the overruling of the demurrers and to the grant of the injunction, the grant of the injunction necessarily implies that the trial judge considered the petition as being good as against a general demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
On the call of the case in the Supreme Court the defendants in error moved to dismiss the bill of exceptions, on the grounds: (1) That “plaintiffs in error are not permitted to unite in filing a single bill of exceptions in this cause, and that this case has not been properly brought to the Supreme Court of Georgia, and that said court has no jurisdiction to entertain a joint writ of error brought in this manner, but that plaintiffs in error should have filed separate bills of exception.” (2) “In their bill of exceptions, plaintiffs in error assign error upon the overruling by the court of their general demurrers filed to the amendment to the creditor’s bill for receiver and injunction in this cause. The Supreme Court will not review such assignments of error on a fast bill of exceptions.” (3) “Plaintiffs in error further assign error in their bill of exceptions upon the refusal of the court to grant their motion to dissolve the injunction issued against them on January 27, 1926. Such an assignment of error will not be reviewed by tbe Supreme Court upon a fast bill of exceptions, but will be dismissed.”
William G. Grant, for plaintiffs in error.
T. B. Higdon, W. 0. Slate, and W. M. Everett, contra.