[¶1] Lawrence Didier appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment. Didier argues the order denying his discharge from civil commitment was not supported by clear and convincing evidence he remains a sexually dangerous individual. Under our modified clearly erroneous standard of review, we conclude the district courts findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Per Curiam.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte