Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010(4), contending that the trial court erroneously terminated diversion and entered judgment pursuant to his plea. For the reasons stated in State v. Merrill, 311 Or. App. 487, ––– P.3d –––– (2021), ORS 138.105(5) bars review of that contention. Defendant also assigns error to the imposition of a fine $255 in excess of what the court announced at sentencing and to the imposition of two special conditions of probation. The state correctly concedes the errors. See State v. Lee, 303 Or. App. 477, 478, 461 P.3d 1043 (2020) (vacating fine and remanding for resentencing where court erred in imposing a greater DUII fine than announced at sentencing); State v. Bowden, 292 Or. App. 815, 818-19, 425 P.3d 475 (2018) (“The sentencing court does not have the discretion to impose a probation condition that runs counter to ORS 137.540(1)(b) and ORS 137.542.”).
Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
PER CURIAM