Defendant was convicted by nonunanimous jury verdict on one count of assault on a public safety officer. ORS 163.208. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal and erred in accepting a nonunanimous jury verdict, contrary to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He makes additional arguments in a supplemental brief. In Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020), the United States Supreme Court concluded that nonunanimous jury verdicts violate the Sixth Amendment. The state concedes that the trial courts acceptance of the nonunanimous verdict was reversible error. We agree, accept the states concession, and exercise our discretion to correct the error for the reasons set forth in State v. Ulery, 366 Or. 500, 464 P.3d 1123 (2020). We reject defendants other assignments of error without discussion.
Reversed and remanded.
PER CURIAM