Defendant was convicted by jury on two counts of first-degree sodomy (Counts 1 and 2); two counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration (Counts 3 and 4); three counts of first-degree sexual abuse (Counts 5, 7, and 8); and one count of luring a minor (Count 9). Defendant argues on appeal that the court erred in instructing the jury that it could return nonunanimous verdicts, and in accepting nonunanimous verdicts on Counts 2, 4, and 8. He also challenges the constitutionality of his sentence. The state concedes that defendants convictions on Counts 2, 4, and 8, based on nonunanimous verdicts, must be reversed in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020). We agree and accept that concession. Because our reversal on those counts requires resentencing it obviates the need to address defendants sentencing arguments. Defendant argues that his remaining convictions also should be reversed based on the erroneous nonunanimous verdict instruction. We reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or. 292, 478 P.3d 515 (2020), in which the court concluded that the erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was harmless with respect to unanimous verdicts.
Counts 2, 4, and 8 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
PER CURIAM