Rukminesh Mehta appeals the district courts orders dismissing his civil action and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Kuhl, No. 3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 4 & 7, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.