MEMORANDUM ***
Ruth Nunez-Campos petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order upholding the denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agencys determination that Nunez-Campos failed to meet her burden for obtaining protection under CAT. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2). The immigration judge (IJ) denied relief under CAT because Nunez-Campos failed to establish that her husband “would even bother to contact her, much less torture her,” or that the Mexican government would acquiesce in any torture. Before us, Nunez-Campos contends that the agency failed to consider all evidence of torture, namely country conditions reports indicating the prevalence of domestic violence against women in Mexico. But the IJ adequately considered and discussed the country conditions evidence, and the “circumstances of [Mexican] women in general ․ do not vitiate the agencys specific findings” as to Nunez-Campos in particular. Dawson v. Garland, 998 F.3d 876, 885 (9th Cir. 2021). Nunez-Campos does not challenge the IJs finding that she failed to establish that her husband would torture her, and the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. The agency thus properly denied her request for relief under CAT.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.