Collins Kusi Sakyi appeals the district courts order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Sakyis motion. See United States v. Collington, 995 F.3d 347, 357-58 (4th Cir. 2021); United States v. Jackson, 952 F.3d 492, 495-96 (4th Cir. 2020) (observing that “the decision whether to grant a reduction is entrusted to the district courts discretion”). Accordingly, we affirm the district courts order. United States v. Sakyi, No. 1:06-cr-00405-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.