John Richard Smith, Texas prisoner # 2037971, has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the dismissal of his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for relief from the district courts judgment dismissing his civil rights action.
Smiths motion to proceed IFP is construed as a challenge to the district courts certification decision that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). This courts inquiry into whether an appeal is taken in good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
Smith has failed to show that he has a nonfrivolous argument that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his Rule 60(b) motion. See Bailey v. Cain, 609 F.3d 763, 767 (5th Cir. 2010). The motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24.
This dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996), abrogated in part on other grounds by Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 537, 135 S.Ct. 1759, 191 L.Ed.2d 803 (2015). Additionally, a dismissal, under § 1915(e), by the district court in another case counts as a strike. Smith is WARNED that if he accumulates a third strike, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.