Billy Douglas, federal prisoner # 18753-001, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of his motion for compassionate release reduction in sentence or home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies or show extraordinary and compelling reasons for a reduction in sentence.
We construe Douglass IFP motion as a challenge to the district courts certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into the good faith of the appeal “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
The district court did not err in denying Douglass motion on the grounds that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See United States v. Franco, 973 F.3d 465, 467-68 (5th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 920, 208 L.Ed.2d 466 (2020). In addition, Douglas fails to meaningfully address the district courts determination that he failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons for an early release. Thus, Douglas fails to demonstrate that his appeal involves any arguably meritorious issues, see Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. We DENY his motion to proceed IFP and DISMISS the appeal as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; Howard, 707 F.2d at 220; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.