MEMORANDUM **
Cindy Escobedo appeals from the district courts judgment revoking supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Escobedo contends that the district court imposed an impermissibly vague condition of supervised release when it stated during the sentencing hearing that Escobedo was required to refrain from “things that could be perceived as alien smuggling activities.” When viewed in context, it is apparent that the district courts statement did not amount to a new condition of supervised release. At most, the oral pronouncement was ambiguous as to whether the court intended to impose an additional condition of supervised release. However, the written judgment, which does not include any such supervised release condition, demonstrates that the court did not intend to impose an additional condition.
AFFIRMED.