Apollos Duckett sued Uber Technologies for breach of contract under Texas common law for Ubers alleged failure to remit toll expenses. Duckett, an Uber driver, seeks $50 billion in damages for the alleged failure to remit those expenses. Uber filed a motion for summary judgment on that claim. The district court granted Ubers motion for summary judgment, with prejudice, and dismissed Ducketts breach of contract claim. The district court also denied Ducketts motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint. Duckett, proceeding pro se, challenges both rulings on appeal.
After carefully considering the briefs, record, the district courts denial of Ducketts motion for leave to amend, and the district courts grant of Ubers summary judgment motion, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.