Plaintiff-Appellant Kelvin Wells appeals the district courts order dismissing his claims against Defendants-Appellees Department of Family Services and the State of Louisiana for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Wellss claims against Defendants-Appellees arise out of alleged violations of his due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. “The Eleventh Amendment bars a states citizens from filing suit against the state or its agencies in federal courts.”
1
Defendants-Appellees are the state of Louisiana and a state agency—the Department of Family Services—that did not waive their Eleventh Amendment immunity against suits in federal court. Therefore, the district court correctly concluded that the Eleventh Amendment deprived it of jurisdiction over Wellss claims against Defendants-Appellees. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district courts dismissal of Wellss claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
1
. Cozzo v. Tangipahoa Par. Council--President Govt, 279 F.3d 273, 280 (5th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted).
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.