Carlos Ybarra, federal prisoner # 97326-180, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of a motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) based on his health and the risk of COVID-19. The IFP motion is construed as a challenge to the district courts certification that the appeal was not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
We review the determination that relief was unwarranted under the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors for abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). The district court clearly articulated fact-specific reasons why Ybarras sentence should not be reduced, chiefly his membership in a violent criminal organization and his murder of a government informant. Ybarras contrary arguments that his history and offense are outweighed by his present characteristics and circumstances amount to a disagreement with the courts balancing of the § 3553(a) factors, which “is not a sufficient ground for reversal.” Chambliss, 948 F.3d at 694.
Although Ybarra fails to show a reversible error by the district court, his appeal is not without any arguable merit, see Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983), and he is financially eligible to proceed IFP, see Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339, 69 S.Ct. 85, 93 L.Ed. 43 (1948). We therefore GRANT the motion to proceed IFP and AFFIRM. Ybarras motion asking this court to reduce his sentence is DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.