Sidney B. Harr appeals the district courts order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Harrs complaint alleging federal civil rights violations and state libel and defamation claims.
*
We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harr v. WRAL-5 News, No. 5:20-cv-00362-M, 2021 WL 141697 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Although the district court dismissed Harrs complaint without prejudice to allow Harr to refile if he believed his claims could be restated, Harrs appeal to this court amounts to a waiver of his right to amend, thereby providing the court with jurisdiction over the appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 612 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 1376, 209 L.Ed.2d 122 (2021). PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.